Here you will be asked to post a screenshot as well as an approximately 400 word description of the criteria or parameters that you implemented in your use of this weeks precedent study.
Here is the schedule for the semester, including the student responsible for moderating the discussion:
Performative
8/20- Shanghai Tower- Beorkrem
8/27- Versioning- Steven Danilowicz
9/3- Adaptive Components- Dylan davis
9/10- Material Constraints- Christian Sjoberg
9/17- Programmatic Constraints- Neil Edwards
Generative
9/24- Aesthetic- Trevor Hess
10/1- Biomimicry- Ben Sullivan
10/8- NO CLASS- Fall Break
Interactive Design
10/15- Smart Objects- Lina Lee
10/22- Smart interfaces- Isabel Fee
Data Visualization
10/29- Emotive Expression- Chris Pockette
11/5- Physical Expression-
11/12- Daylighting-
11/19- Final Project begins
11/26
12/3
Welcome to the home for Digital Research 2013
Tuesday, October 22, 2013
Context Free
When I started to think through the logic of context free, I
began to realize that it would be easier to program the park and its geometry
through a series of interrelated sketches, that would all act in a different
geometric logic. This way, the park elements, elevation, trees and walkway
could each have their own logic, and not be dependent on the geometry that came
before it. Thus, the final park design is shown by overlapping the different
images that came out of each [ground, tree and walkway] script.
Before constructing any of the scripts, I decided on fractal
logic, where each square of the park was divided into sections. Given that the
original park was a 2:1 rectangle, this act of subdivision allows me to keep
the existing geometry of the park constant. From there it was a matter of
modifying a subdivision script, consisting of a 2:1 outline shape, and a 1:1 4-square,
or 9-square fractal shape. This is derived from the quad city example script
that uses a whole and quads to make city fractals.
To design each layer, I modified the chance that each QUAD
shape rule would be selected. By doing so, I could affect the chance of
subdivisions in the design. By doing this, I could make a park with fewer
subdivisions, or one with more subdivisions depending what the aesthetics of
the park element called for. For the landscape element, I made sure that none
of the squares were white and tried to represent a pixel-like map of the
topology. This resulted in a number of larger fields, and then many smaller
fields that could represent a rapid change in elevation.
For the trees I utilized a rotated 9-square subdivision. The
reason for the 9-square subdivision is that in a non-rotated configuration, the
center square could be empty, and could approximate the organization of trees
around a field. By rotating the subdivided square I could achieve a
pseudo-random organization that approximated the organization of trees better
than a non-rotated square could.
Finally, for the walkways script, I changed the chance of
subdivision to be very low, so that the park would be subdivided into larger
shapes. Each square was colored to represent a specific quadrant of a circle.
This in effect generates a programmed pathway that is determined by adjacent
squares. In theory this works, but in practice the represented quadrant had to
be fudged a little bit, since the individual subdivisions did not have an
awareness of the colors around them.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment