Here you will be asked to post a screenshot as well as an approximately 400 word description of the criteria or parameters that you implemented in your use of this weeks precedent study.
Here is the schedule for the semester, including the student responsible for moderating the discussion:
Performative
8/20- Shanghai Tower- Beorkrem
8/27- Versioning- Steven Danilowicz
9/3- Adaptive Components- Dylan davis
9/10- Material Constraints- Christian Sjoberg
9/17- Programmatic Constraints- Neil Edwards
Generative
9/24- Aesthetic- Trevor Hess
10/1- Biomimicry- Ben Sullivan
10/8- NO CLASS- Fall Break
Interactive Design
10/15- Smart Objects- Lina Lee
10/22- Smart interfaces- Isabel Fee
Data Visualization
10/29- Emotive Expression- Chris Pockette
11/5- Physical Expression-
11/12- Daylighting-
11/19- Final Project begins
11/26
12/3
Monday, November 4, 2013
Sjoberg Grammar Evolver
The processing script used to create evolutionary iterations of this design allowed for an ever changing interpretation of design criteria. I chose three simple variables in order to retain the overall essence of the original script. These variables were move, scale, and brightness. Its pretty incredible some of the unexpected outcomes even with limited variable inputs. The highlighted iteration in the below image exemplifies this. It has a sort of impressionist painting quality to it. In class we discussed the emergence of logic within the script, I was surprised by the number of iterations that seemed to highlight a single original action of the script. I chose, for the final iteration, a composition that had a strong network of circulation and a variety of overlapping spaces at a key moment.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment